The SnapKnot Blog: weddings, photography, and more

Add_portfolio_top

September 21, 2011

Fun, Candid, Fashion Wedding Photos with PhojoPhotos

Filed under: weddings — Lindsay @ 6:02 am

We at SnapKnot are delighted to welcome Joe Durkin of PhojoPhoto to our list of Las Vegas wedding photographers, although he can also be seen shooting in Chicago, Los Angeles, New York, and San Diego. With 13 years of high-end photography experience in various locations throughout the world, Durkin’s  fun, artistic, fashion wedding photos might be exactly what you’re looking for on your wedding day.

bride, groom, park

bride, flower girl

bride and groom, dock

bride, window

flower girl, kissing, bride

bride, bouquet

couple kissing, beach

To see more of PhojoPhoto’s fashion wedding photos and to contact Joe Durkin directly, visit his website: http://phojophoto.com/index2.php.

Did you like this? Please share it!

September 16, 2011

Part 3: Are You in It to Win It?

Filed under: photography — Tags: , — Mike @ 3:27 pm

in it to win it, scooping poker pot, winning, win, success

Image courtesy of woodleywonderworks

This is third and final part of our series focused on answering some challenging questions that wedding photographers may have when considering free vs paid advertising options, both broadly and within the specific context of SnapKnot.

In Part 1, we discussed some conceptual differences to consider between free and paid listings, and took you through some simple return on investment calculations.

In Part 2 we discussed commitment (“are you in it to win it, or are you just dipping your toes in the water.”) and how to avoid the costly traps of Confirmation Bias.

With Part 1 and Part 2 as background, today we’re going to discuss the “we tried it; it didn’t work” phenomena, within the specific context of long term commitment to your online advertising plan – we’ll assume you’ve made the decision to take the plunge and jump into the pool, but now you’re wondering how long you should hold your breath.

Consider this example from Gary Vaynerchuck’s book The Thank You Economy, where he is specifically talking about “excuses companies tend to make when justifying their refusal to commit to and invest in social media.”

[The “we tried it, it doesn’t work mentality”] shows a total lack of patience, which makes no sense in a business setting. A lot of business leaders have been willing to give social media initiatives a shot [often to the tune of several hundred thousand, if not millions of dollars]. They posted comments and tweeted like crazy for six months or, worse, six weeks, and they didn’t see any results. Web traffic didn’t increase enough; sales didn’t spike; content didn’t go viral. Faced with disappointing results, they patted themselves on the back for trying something new and slammed the door. If they’re progressive they chalked up the failure to getting in too early on an immature platform, but most are convinced the platform is hype and not worth the effort. They’re like people who have not seen a bicycle and try to pedal with their hands, then toss it aside, declaring the thing a waste of time and impractical for transportation.

Social media is a long-term play, which is why a majority of companies that have tried it have failed to reach their potential…You can’t reap the benefits of social media…without a ton of patience, as well as commitment and strategy.

So what does this mean for your wedding photography business? Simply put, it means that in the same way it takes a long time to build a meaningful social media presence, online brand exposure takes time, and you have to be in it to win it. But how long, you might ask?

Remember the return on investment calculation from Part 1? That’s a perfect place for you to start determining your time commitment. While we  recommend a trial period of at least 6 months on SnapKnot paid listings, you should try running different numbers and come up with a plan that is desirable for you both in terms of expected financial return and the financial commitment required for you to stay the course. This will be a different threshold for everyone.

But most importantly, if your return on investment calculation is based on a test period of one year, then it only makes sense to stay committed for that entire year. If you “don’t see results” in 3 months and then choose to downgrade to a Free account, you’ve actually eliminated 75% (9 months) of the upside in your calculation! If you’ve made the smart decision to invest in a paid listing, you will want to strongly consider the equally smart decision to stay committed to the entire course.

So just like building a social media presence, investing in a paid online advertising platform should be considered a long term play. It’s truly the case that the path to success requires not only an in-depth assessment of the likelihood of success for different advertising options (for example, reasonably analyzing the feature differences between the Free and Diamond SnapKnot listings), a complete data analysis (make sure to avoid the confirmation bias trap), a certain financial investment (consider that return on investment calculation), and long term commitment.

Of course, in the end all of this means different things to different individuals and businesses, but we hope this discussion has been useful for you as you consider the different marketing options our there for your wedding photography business.

If you enjoyed this article, please consider sharing it with your friends via the social media widget below. And if you have comments or questions of your own, please feel free to share them in the comments section. We love hearing your thoughts, and would look forward to continuing the discussion below.


Still unsure? Read what current paying members have to say: reviews and testimonials.

Did you like this? Please share it!

September 15, 2011

Part 2: Photography Marketing – Confirmation Bias

Filed under: photography,weddings — Tags: , — Mike @ 12:17 pm

dipping toe in water

Image courtesy of MrVJTod

In Part 1 of this series, we began discussing a new approach for wedding photographers to consider when making the decision between free and paid listings on SnapKnot. We deconstructed some conceptual differences between free and paid plans, and provided an example of a simple return on investment calculation.

Today in Part 2 we will be discussing a common but dangerous bias that should be strongly considered alongside the return on investment calculation.

Let’s begin with the following question:

Are you in it to win it, or are you just dipping your toes in the water?

In The Thank You Economy, Gary Vaynerchuck makes the following argument:

Just because you can’t dribble well of get the rock in the hoop, doesn’t mean that there’s a design flaw in your basketball…generally [it’s] because [people] aren’t fully committed to it; they still don’t get that intent matters…our intent affects the force of our actions…it’s like a competitive swimmer who hangs around the edge of the pool for a month, carefully dipping her toes and analyzing the water, and who then complains that her swim times aren’t improving.

Unfortunately, by only dipping your toes in the water (which in our case means only “testing” a Free listing), not only are you by nature not fully committed to utilizing all the important benefits of a service, but you may also be opening yourself up to a common bias that may unintentionally lead you to draw the wrong conclusions about your likelihood of future success, therefore preventing you from growing your wedding photography business before you’re even had a chance to give it a real chance.

Confirmation Bias

In his recent book, The House Advantage: Playing the Odds to Win Big in Business, Jeffrey Ma tells the following story:

The classic example of Confirmation Bias comes to us from World War II. American military personnel, when examining returning planes damaged during warfare, noticed that “some parts of planes were hit by enemy fire more than other parts.” Analyzing the pattern of bullet holes in the returning planes, they decided to have these areas reinforced to withstand enemy fire better.

Seems logical enough, but there is a clear problem with their analysis. Because they only get to see the planes that survive, they are only seeing a portion of the planes that were hit. Even more problematic, planes that they are not seeing are the more important sample to look at. Since the damage inflicted on those planes prevented them from returning back to the base, it is imperative to look at them to determine what areas on the plan are critical to reinforce.

The mistake in the above example is that the individuals were drawing incorrect conclusions by merely looking at a selection of the data.

With the Confirmation Bias in mind, how might you reconsider the following quotewe  mentioned in Part 1,

“I’m going to try the Free plan and then upgrade if it works.”

and also reconsider the question posed above:

“Are you in it to win it, or are you just dipping your toes in the water?”

OK, so now maybe you’re considering jumping in the pool. But how long are you willing to hold your breath?

We’ll help answer that question in Part 3 [upcoming].

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Did you like this? Please share it!
« Newer PostsOlder Posts »